Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

HALX vs MAGO

Tuttle Capital Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence ETF vs Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF

HALX

Tuttle Capital Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

MAGO

Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF

Tuttle Capital Management, LLC

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$2M

Key differences

  • HALX is classified as equity, while MAGO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • HALX follows a index tracking strategy; MAGO uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

HALXMAGO
Annual cost (TER)0.99%
Fund size (AUM)$2M
Since2025
Dividend yield
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingoption income
CAGR 1YN/AN/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y
Max drawdown-17.98%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to HALX and MAGO