Screener
HAPS vs PSC
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF vs Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.23% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than HAPS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAPS | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $157M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.0% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.11% | 18.83% |
| Max drawdown | -27.44% | -46.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAPS and PSC
Explore further