Screener
HAPS vs SGRW
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF vs Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- HAPS follows a index tracking strategy; SGRW uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAPS | SGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $157M | — |
| Since | 2023 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -27.44% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAPS and SGRW
Explore further