Screener
HAUZ vs IGF
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- HAUZ costs 0.29% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than HAUZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAUZ | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $10.7B |
| Since | 2013 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.34% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.5% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.37 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -39.51% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAUZ and IGF
Explore further