Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

HBMX vs MAGO

Tuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETF vs Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF

HBMX

Tuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

MAGO

Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$2M

Key differences

  • HBMX is classified as equity, while MAGO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • HBMX follows a active selection strategy; MAGO uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

HBMXMAGO
Annual cost (TER)0.99%
Fund size (AUM)$2M
Since2025
Dividend yield
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1YN/AN/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y
Max drawdown-17.98%

Similar to HBMX and MAGO