Screener
HCMT vs RHRX
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Key differences
- HCMT costs 0.20% less per year.
- HCMT is significantly larger than RHRX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HCMT is classified as equity, while RHRX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- HCMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; RHRX uses option income.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HCMT | RHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.18% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $551M | $34M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.43% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.3% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.51% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -25.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HCMT and RHRX
Explore further