Screener
HCMT vs SPTS
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SPTS costs 1.15% less per year.
- SPTS is significantly larger than HCMT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HCMT is classified as equity, while SPTS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- HCMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; SPTS uses index tracking.
- SPTS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HCMT | SPTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.18% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $551M | $6.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.43% | 3.94% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.3% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.51% | 1.32% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -5.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HCMT and SPTS
Explore further