Screener
HCMT vs TOTL
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF vs State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF
Key differences
- TOTL costs 0.63% less per year.
- TOTL is significantly larger than HCMT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HCMT is classified as equity, while TOTL is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- HCMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; TOTL uses active selection.
- TOTL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HCMT | TOTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.18% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $551M | $4.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.43% | 5.26% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.3% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.51% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -16.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HCMT and TOTL
Explore further