Screener
HCOW vs DIVO
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF vs Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- DIVO costs 0.09% less per year.
- DIVO is significantly larger than HCOW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HCOW | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $7.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 11.68% | 5.07% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.11% | 9.10% |
| Max drawdown | -24.15% | -30.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HCOW and DIVO
Explore further