Screener
HCOW vs EHY
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF vs Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- HCOW costs 0.10% less per year.
- HCOW is significantly larger than EHY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| HCOW | EHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $4M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 11.68% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.08% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.15% | -51.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HCOW and EHY
Explore further