Screener
HCRB vs SLQD
Hartford Core Bond ETF vs iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SLQD costs 0.23% less per year.
- SLQD is significantly larger than HCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLQD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SLQD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HCRB | SLQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $360M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2020 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 4.25% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.1% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.85% | 1.49% |
| Max drawdown | -19.90% | -12.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HCRB and SLQD
Explore further