Screener
HEAL vs BMED
Global X HealthTech ETF vs iShares Health Innovation Active ETF
Key differences
- HEAL costs 0.05% less per year.
- HEAL follows a index tracking strategy; BMED uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BMED has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HEAL | BMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $10M |
| Since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -20.2% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -10.3% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.0% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.71% | 14.94% |
| Max drawdown | -65.76% | -36.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HEAL and BMED
Explore further