Screener
HEAL vs BOTZ
Global X HealthTech ETF vs Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- HEAL costs 0.18% less per year.
- BOTZ is significantly larger than HEAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BOTZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HEAL | BOTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $3.4B |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -20.2% | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -10.3% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.0% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.71% | 24.09% |
| Max drawdown | -65.76% | -55.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HEAL and BOTZ
Explore further