Screener
HEAL vs CGGO
Global X HealthTech ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO is significantly larger than HEAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HEAL covers north america markets; CGGO covers global.
- HEAL follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HEAL | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -20.2% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -10.3% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.71% | 16.59% |
| Max drawdown | -65.76% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HEAL and CGGO
Explore further