Screener
HEAL vs GXPE
Global X HealthTech ETF vs Global X Purecap MSCI Energy ETF
Key differences
- GXPE costs 0.35% less per year.
- HEAL is significantly larger than GXPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HEAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HEAL | GXPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $2M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -20.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | -10.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.47 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.70% | — |
| Max drawdown | -65.76% | -12.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HEAL and GXPE
Explore further