Screener
HEAL vs PAVE
Global X HealthTech ETF vs Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Key differences
- PAVE is significantly larger than HEAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HEAL | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2020 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -20.0% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -10.4% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.5% | +17.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.47 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.70% | 18.91% |
| Max drawdown | -65.76% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HEAL and PAVE
Explore further