Screener
HEAL vs TRUH
Global X HealthTech ETF vs Vaneck Healthcare TruSector ETF
Key differences
- TRUH costs 0.40% less per year.
- HEAL is significantly larger than TRUH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HEAL follows a index tracking strategy; TRUH uses active selection.
- HEAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HEAL | TRUH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $0.5M |
| Since | 2020 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -20.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | -10.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.71% | — |
| Max drawdown | -65.76% | -4.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HEAL and TRUH
Explore further