Screener
HECA vs AMAX
Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- HECA costs 0.06% less per year.
- HECA is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HECA follows a multi strategy strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HECA | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.30% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $378M | $60M |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 10.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.98% |
| Max drawdown | -11.81% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HECA and AMAX
Explore further