Screener
HECA vs HGRO
Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF vs Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- HGRO costs 0.60% less per year.
- HECA is significantly larger than HGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HECA is classified as alternative, while HGRO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HECA follows a multi strategy strategy; HGRO uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HECA | HGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.30% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $378M | $97M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.81% | -7.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HECA and HGRO
Explore further