Screener
HECO vs XLF
State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF vs State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
HECO is an alternative ETF, while XLF is an equity ETF. HECO charges 0.90% a year and XLF 0.08%.
- HECO is an alternative fund, while XLF is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- HECO follows a option income strategy; XLF uses index tracking.
- XLF costs 0.82% less per year.
- XLF is much larger than HECO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- XLF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HECO | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $49.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +117.9% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.71% | 14.62% |
| Max drawdown | -43.74% | -42.86% |
Similar to HECO and XLF
Explore further