Screener
HEQT vs EPSV
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- HEQT costs 0.45% less per year.
- HEQT is significantly larger than EPSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HEQT is classified as alternative, while EPSV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HEQT follows a option income strategy; EPSV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| HEQT | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $321M | $5M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.21% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.3% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.50% | 17.79% |
| Max drawdown | -11.51% | -8.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HEQT and EPSV
Explore further