Screener
HERO vs ESPO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF vs VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
Key differences
- HERO costs 0.05% less per year.
- ESPO is significantly larger than HERO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ESPO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HERO | ESPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $257M |
| Since | 2019 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.82% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -10.1% | -9.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.6% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.61% | 19.07% |
| Max drawdown | -54.02% | -50.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HERO and ESPO
Explore further