Screener
HERO vs GXPC
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF vs Global X Purecap MSCI Communication Services ETF
Key differences
- GXPC costs 0.35% less per year.
- HERO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HERO | GXPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $77M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.82% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -10.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.61% | — |
| Max drawdown | -54.02% | -16.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HERO and GXPC
Explore further