Screener
HFGM vs GGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs GGM Macro Alignment ETF
Key differences
- GGM costs 0.07% less per year.
- HFGM is significantly larger than GGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFGM is classified as alternative, while GGM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; GGM uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | GGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.94% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $18M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.05% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.77% | 11.32% |
| Max drawdown | -10.66% | -19.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGM and GGM
Explore further