Skip to content
Screener

HFGM vs GHTA

Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF

HFGM

Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF

Annual cost

1.01%

Fund size

$155M

GHTA

Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF

Annual cost

1.77%

Fund size

$42M

Key differences

Both HFGM and GHTA are alternative ETFs. HFGM charges 1.01% a year and GHTA 1.77%. The main difference: HFGM costs 0.76% less per year.

  • HFGM costs 0.76% less per year.
  • HFGM is much larger than GHTA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

HFGMGHTA
Annual cost (TER)1.01%1.77%
Fund size (AUM)$155M$42M
Since20252021
Dividend yield5.06%3.75%
Asset classalternativealternative
Region
Strategytactical allocationtactical allocation
CAGR 1Y+32.0%+5.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+9.4%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.58
Volatility 1Y22.89%8.08%
Max drawdown-10.97%-13.92%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to HFGM and GHTA