Screener
HFGM vs ISMF
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- ISMF costs 0.21% less per year.
- HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $57M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.05% | 2.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.77% | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -10.66% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGM and ISMF
Explore further