Screener
HFGM vs NDAA
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
Key differences
Both HFGM and NDAA are alternative ETFs. HFGM charges 1.01% a year and NDAA 0.65%. The main difference: NDAA costs 0.36% less per year.
- NDAA costs 0.36% less per year.
- HFGM is much larger than NDAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | NDAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $5M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 5.06% | 2.44% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.89% | 11.20% |
| Max drawdown | -10.97% | -13.50% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.