Screener
HFGO vs EPSV
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- HFGO costs 0.29% less per year.
- HFGO is significantly larger than EPSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFGO follows a active selection strategy; EPSV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGO | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $181M | $5M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.94% | 17.79% |
| Max drawdown | -44.64% | -8.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGO and EPSV
Explore further