Screener
HFND vs EPSV
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- EPSV costs 0.19% less per year.
- HFND is significantly larger than EPSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFND is classified as alternative, while EPSV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HFND follows a multi strategy strategy; EPSV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFND | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $5M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.72% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.4% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.44% | 17.79% |
| Max drawdown | -13.31% | -8.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFND and EPSV
Explore further