Screener
HGRO vs HECA
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF vs Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF
Key differences
- HGRO costs 0.60% less per year.
- HECA is significantly larger than HGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HGRO is classified as equity, while HECA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- HGRO follows a active selection strategy; HECA uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| HGRO | HECA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 1.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $97M | $378M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.61% | -11.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HGRO and HECA
Explore further