Screener
HGRO vs PWB
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- PWB costs 0.15% less per year.
- PWB is significantly larger than HGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HGRO follows a active selection strategy; PWB uses index tracking.
- PWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HGRO | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $97M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +42.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +33.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.41% |
| Max drawdown | -7.61% | -32.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HGRO and PWB
Explore further