Screener
HIBL vs FAZ
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- HIBL costs 0.05% less per year.
- HIBL follows a leveraged strategy; FAZ uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, HIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIBL | FAZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 1.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $120M |
| Since | 2019 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 3.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +242.4% | -9.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +60.5% | -38.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | -27.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | -0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 66.14% | 43.24% |
| Max drawdown | -88.27% | -99.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HIBL and FAZ
Explore further