Screener
HIDV vs PFM
AB US High Dividend ETF vs Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
Key differences
Both HIDV and PFM are equity ETFs. HIDV charges 0.35% a year and PFM 0.52%. The main difference: HIDV follows a active selection strategy; PFM uses index tracking.
- HIDV follows a active selection strategy; PFM uses index tracking.
- HIDV costs 0.17% less per year.
- PFM is much larger than HIDV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, HIDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIDV | PFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $192M | $781M |
| Since | 2023 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.25% | 1.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.6% | +16.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.04% | 9.54% |
| Max drawdown | -18.76% | -32.21% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.