Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

HIGH vs LQTI

Simplify Enhanced Income ETF vs FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF

HIGH

Simplify Enhanced Income ETF

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$75M

LQTI

FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$288M

Key differences

Both HIGH and LQTI are alternative ETFs. HIGH charges 0.50% a year and LQTI 0.65%. The main difference: HIGH costs 0.15% less per year.

  • HIGH costs 0.15% less per year.
  • LQTI is much larger than HIGH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

HIGHLQTI
Annual cost (TER)0.50%0.65%
Fund size (AUM)$75M$288M
Since20222025
Dividend yield7.33%9.06%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1Y-4.3%+4.7%
CAGR 3Y+2.8%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y-0.03N/A
Volatility 1Y8.85%5.16%
Max drawdown-9.50%-3.41%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to HIGH and LQTI