Screener
HIMU vs GHYG
iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF vs iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF
Key differences
- HIMU is significantly larger than GHYG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIMU | GHYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $205M |
| Since | 2006 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.16% | 6.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.92% | 4.63% |
| Max drawdown | -8.01% | -27.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HIMU and GHYG
Explore further