Screener
HMOP vs CRDT
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF vs Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
Key differences
- HMOP costs 0.70% less per year.
- HMOP is significantly larger than CRDT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HMOP follows a index tracking strategy; CRDT uses active selection.
- HMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HMOP | CRDT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $740M | $38M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.48% | 6.51% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.1% | -0.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.71% | 8.48% |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -9.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HMOP and CRDT
Explore further