Screener
HMOP vs PHYD
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF vs Putnam ESG High Yield ETF
Key differences
- HMOP costs 0.26% less per year.
- HMOP is significantly larger than PHYD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HMOP follows a index tracking strategy; PHYD uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PHYD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HMOP | PHYD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $740M | $8M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.48% | 8.54% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +9.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.73% | 3.28% |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -4.33% |
Similar to HMOP and PHYD
Explore further