Screener
HODL vs BTCC
VanEck Bitcoin ETF vs Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- HODL costs 0.65% less per year.
- HODL is significantly larger than BTCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HODL is classified as cryptocurrency, while BTCC is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| HODL | BTCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $17M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 83.34% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | — | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -30.2% | -23.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.15% | 32.12% |
| Max drawdown | -49.25% | -44.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HODL and BTCC
Explore further