Screener
HQGO vs ACGR
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF vs American Century ETF Trust - American Century Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- HQGO follows a index tracking strategy; ACGR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HQGO | ACGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | — |
| Since | 2023 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +25.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 15.56% |
| Max drawdown | -20.85% | -34.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HQGO and ACGR
Explore further