Screener
HQGO vs JGRW
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF vs Jensen Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- HQGO costs 0.23% less per year.
- HQGO follows a index tracking strategy; JGRW uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HQGO | JGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $100M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 11.78% |
| Max drawdown | -20.85% | -14.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HQGO and JGRW
Explore further