Screener
HQGO vs ROSC
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- ROSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HQGO | ROSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $55M |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 1.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +33.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 15.75% |
| Max drawdown | -20.85% | -43.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HQGO and ROSC
Explore further