Screener
HQGO vs WINN
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF vs Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF
Key differences
- HQGO costs 0.23% less per year.
- WINN is significantly larger than HQGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HQGO follows a index tracking strategy; WINN uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HQGO | WINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -20.85% | -32.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HQGO and WINN
Explore further