Screener
HRTS vs CANC
Tema Heart & Health ETF vs Tema Oncology ETF
Key differences
- CANC is significantly larger than HRTS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HRTS follows a active selection strategy; CANC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| HRTS | CANC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50M | $176M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +57.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.94% | 23.20% |
| Max drawdown | -25.81% | -28.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HRTS and CANC
Explore further