Screener
HTEC vs IDNA
Robo Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF vs iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- IDNA costs 0.21% less per year.
- IDNA is significantly larger than HTEC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IDNA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HTEC | IDNA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $53M | $160M |
| Since | 2019 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.04% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +49.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -4.2% | -7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.27% | 24.43% |
| Max drawdown | -57.53% | -68.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HTEC and IDNA
Explore further