Screener
HTRB vs FLGV
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF vs Franklin U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- FLGV costs 0.20% less per year.
- HTRB covers global markets; FLGV covers north america.
- HTRB follows a active selection strategy; FLGV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HTRB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HTRB | FLGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $998M |
| Since | 2017 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.63% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.1% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.4% | -0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | -0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.94% | 3.79% |
| Max drawdown | -19.48% | -17.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HTRB and FLGV
Explore further