Screener
HUMN vs GKAT
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 0.16% less per year.
- HUMN is classified as alternative, while GKAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HUMN follows a structured outcome strategy; GKAT uses active selection.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HUMN | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $158M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.40% | -10.41% |
Similar to HUMN and GKAT
Explore further