Screener
HYDB vs NJNK
iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF vs Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF
Key differences
- HYDB costs 0.11% less per year.
- HYDB is significantly larger than NJNK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYDB follows a index tracking strategy; NJNK uses active selection.
- HYDB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYDB | NJNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $47M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 7.11% | 6.30% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.0% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.82% | 4.03% |
| Max drawdown | -21.58% | -4.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYDB and NJNK
Explore further