Screener
HYDB vs SCUB
iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF vs Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- HYDB is significantly larger than SCUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYDB follows a index tracking strategy; SCUB uses active selection.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYDB | SCUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $25M |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 7.11% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.82% | — |
| Max drawdown | -21.58% | -0.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYDB and SCUB
Explore further