Skip to content
Screener

HYDW vs PSH

Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF vs PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF

HYDW

Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$66M

PSH

PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$161M

Key differences

Both HYDW and PSH are fixed income ETFs. HYDW charges 0.20% a year and PSH 0.45%. The main difference: HYDW follows a index tracking strategy; PSH uses active selection.

  • HYDW follows a index tracking strategy; PSH uses active selection.
  • HYDW costs 0.25% less per year.
  • HYDW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

HYDWPSH
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.45%
Fund size (AUM)$66M$161M
Since20182023
Dividend yield5.59%6.79%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+5.6%+5.7%
CAGR 3Y+7.2%N/A
CAGR 5Y+3.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.81N/A
Volatility 1Y2.97%2.87%
Max drawdown-17.75%-3.06%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to HYDW and PSH