Screener
HYDW vs SYFI
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF vs AB Short Duration High Yield ETF
Key differences
- HYDW costs 0.20% less per year.
- SYFI is significantly larger than HYDW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYDW is classified as fixed income, while SYFI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- HYDW follows a index tracking strategy; SYFI uses active selection.
- SYFI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYDW | SYFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $66M | $895M |
| Since | 2018 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 5.58% | 6.25% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.02% | 3.20% |
| Max drawdown | -17.75% | -4.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYDW and SYFI
Explore further